Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Sides

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Sides (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only WP:ROUTINE sources. Has not played in a high enough league for long enough and has not not won any major awards (only a an All-Star game appearance, not a First Team All-Star) to pass WP:NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 16:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 16:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The product of an editor who ultimately received a community ban on new article creation for the many hundreds of NN articles (often in open defiance of both community consensus and appropriate notability guidelines) made to bump up his page creation count. As with the vast majority of these articles, the subject here is a journeyman hockey player in the mid-minors with an undistinguished career. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG beyond routine sports coverage explicitly debarred from satisfying notability. Ravenswing 06:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.